By comparison, the Ford twin-turbo 2.7L V6 includes a square 3.26 inches for bore and stroke, while the aluminum head is bolted to a block made from compacted graphite iron.
As Makuloco notes right off the bat, many of the problematic vehicles that roll into his shop only have issues because of a lack of proper maintenance, and that includes the twin-turbocharged Ford 3.5L V6 EcoBoost engine that’s there right now. This particular Ford EcoBoost powerplant has a healthy 224,000 miles on it, but as our resident
But a V8 would probably fit in the Flex and Explorer if Ford wanted to make that happen. In the 2017 F-150, the V8 generates 385 horsepower, just 10 more than the 3.5 EcoBoost, and costs $1,100 less.
3.5 N/A vs 2.7 Ecoboost. Well I'm thinking about getting a new 2015 2 wheel drive extended cab in either the Eco or 3.5. Man I really want the 2.7 but something tells me not to and get the less $$$ 795 3.5 V6. Won't be working this truck either just a daily driver. Anything to be cautious about on the new 2.7.
Bronco®. Maverick®. Feel the true power of the 2024 Ford Expedition® SUV featuring the 3.5L EcoBoost® engine with 400 horsepower & 480 lb.-ft. of torque. Enjoy seamless & precise shifting with the 10-speed SelectShift® Automatic Transmission, delivering a smooth ride.
Turbo or SC the V6 is going to cost at least $5500. For the $4000 difference, you can just slap a big turbo on the 2.3 and blow the turbo 3.7 out of the water. 2.3 is fully forged bottom end, the V6 isnt. Larze123 • 2015 Ecoboost Premium • 9 yr. ago • Edited 9 yr. ago.
vjAa. emkm6fo8o7.pages.dev/228emkm6fo8o7.pages.dev/190emkm6fo8o7.pages.dev/416emkm6fo8o7.pages.dev/160emkm6fo8o7.pages.dev/153emkm6fo8o7.pages.dev/583emkm6fo8o7.pages.dev/453emkm6fo8o7.pages.dev/174
ford explorer 2.3 ecoboost vs 3.5 v6
